[Case 04]
Stacking clarity for B.com's partners
Travel
Increasing partner understanding and clarity over the stacking logic by a 48%, with an increase of 17% in confidence with the final prices.
Boosting understanding and confidence through transparency and interactive learning.
[Project Overview]
Stacking has been identified as a major pain point for partners using promotion tools at Booking.com. Research studies consistently highlight partners' confusion and frustration with the stacking mechanisms, leading to blockers in adoption, incorrect setup, and high churn rates.
[Problem Statement]
A small amount of B.com's partners understand stacking. Not understanding leads to the fear of the final price being to low and that everyone will see that same lowest price. This uncertainty leads to either churn or not adopting new promotions.
[Industry]
Travel
[My Role]
Senior UX Designer
[Platforms]
Desktop
[Timeline]
2024
[Persona]

Home and small hotel owner to big hotel chains.
Accommodations owners and revenue managers.
Small hotel owners juggle every aspect of their business, often overwhelmed during busy mornings and evenings. They rarely have time to manage OTAs and expect a simple, time-efficient platform that helps them keep guests happy and profits up.
Age: --
Location: All countries and regions
Tech Proficiency: Novice to Moderate
Gender: --
[Goal]
Understand how stacking works to take better and more informed decisions.
Understand how multiple discounts (promotions) work together and how this affect the final price they are offering to guests.
Understand what audiences they are targeting and what final prices each will see.
[Frustrations]
Everything is about discounts.
Fear of offering to many discounts because of the price being to low.
Fear of the price being the same to all their guests.
[Process]
[Outcome]
After a follow up survey, we learned that partners stacking understanding increased by 48%.
Partner confidence in the final price they were offering to guests increased by 17% thanks to this tool.
Partner's feedback indicated a positive 91% with comments mostly praising the interaction and the information given.
[Key Learnings]